I am trying to define a union struct with some struct and primitive members overlapping in memory with a simple array. This works perfectly in Clang and MSVC, b
To value-initialize an object of type T means: ... — if T is a (possibly cv-qualified) class type without a user-provided or deleted default constructor,
The C++ standard says that unqualified names from nondependent base classes are preferred over template parameters. What is the reasoning behind this? The follo
I recently learnt that constructors do not have names in C++ and some other things about them. I am also aware that a function has a type in C++ called a functi
Scott Meyers writes in Effective Modern C++ (Item 30 page 210) that there's no need to define integral static const data members in classes; declarations alone
Can sizeof(size_t) be less than sizeof(int)? Do the C and/or C++ standards guarantee that using unsigned int for array indexing is always safe?
Consider the following example: struct Parent { Parent (); Parent (const Parent &); }; struct Child : public Parent { using Parent::Parent; }