'Use xDs as a generic control plane
While xDs was proposed as the control plane for Envoy (and later on gRpc), the protocol itself is very generic. Resource are represented by resource types, and the resource content are encoded as proto.Any. As such, I feel that if I have a xDs server, I can extend it to deliver resource types unrelated to Envoy or gRpc.
Has anyone tried this? What are the pros and cons for the xDs protocol as a generic control plane?
Sources
This article follows the attribution requirements of Stack Overflow and is licensed under CC BY-SA 3.0.
Source: Stack Overflow
Solution | Source |
---|