'Committing .yarn directory to git when using yarn berry
In the next version of yarn ("berry") the manual states that one should just commit the directory created called .yarn
, but if you use the multi-version setup for yarn, this directory contains the file releases/yarn-berry.js
which seems to be the entire berry version of yarn, taking up more than 2MB of disk.
This just seems really wrong - why should I commit a package manager to git, just to get it to work?
Solution 1:[1]
The new docs states using node's newest corepack feature (to date).
This means that when using appropriate node you only need to place a valid packageManager
field value in package.json
and run corepack enable
, e.g.
{
"name": "foo",
"packageManager": "[email protected]",
"scripts": {
...
}
}
Solution 2:[2]
The Yarn developers explain the rationale for this in the Installation docs, in the section called "About global installs":
Using a single package manager across your system has always been a problem. To be stable, installs need to be run with the same package manager version across environments, otherwise there's a risk we introduce accidental breaking changes between versions - after all, that's why the concept of lockfile was introduced in the first place! And with Yarn being in a sense your very first project dependency, it should make sense to "lock it" as well.
Once Yarn is tracked and "locked" as a per-project dependency, it ends up getting committed to Git if you follow Yarn 2's zero-install strategy, the rationale for which is explained here.
I'm a newcomer to Yarn, but I spent years working devops, helping developers figure out why their code would sometimes build correctly on half of the team's laptops but not on the other half, or would suddenly start failing to build in CI while continuing to work elsewhere. Trying to keep the version of npm
consistent across every computer and codebase in the company was essentially impossible, given that Node is constantly being upgraded, but locking each project to its own specific version of Yarn -- which, by being committed to Git, is guaranteed to be available in every checkout of that project -- solves this problem.
Solution 3:[3]
I have written a small tool for those people who don't want to commit Yarn 2+ binary into their git repos, while still benefiting from sticking Yarn version per project. If you already have Yarn 2+ configured in your project just don't want to commit it, you can run:
yarn dlx pinyarn
This command will generate .pinyarn.js
(4KB) which you should commit, instead. .pinyarn.js
will contain URLs inside to download Yarn 2+ and its plugins from the official Yarn Berry GitHub repo. .pinyarn.js
will download binary and plugins from these URLs if they are not downloaded yet.
You can also specify which version of Yarn 2+ you want via:
yarn dlx pinyarn 3
- the latest released Yarn 3 version, or
yarn dlx pinyarn 2.2.2
- version 2.2.2, or
yarn dlx master
- version from latest sources, or
yarn dlx 1638
- version from Pull Request 1638
The pinyarn
tool repo on GitHub:
https://github.com/sysgears/pinyarn
Solution 4:[4]
The official documentation mentions what's should be ignored and what should be committed. It can solve this problem I think. https://yarnpkg.com/getting-started/qa#which-files-should-be-gitignored
Sources
This article follows the attribution requirements of Stack Overflow and is licensed under CC BY-SA 3.0.
Source: Stack Overflow
Solution | Source |
---|---|
Solution 1 | Dror Weiss |
Solution 2 | Mechanical Fish |
Solution 3 | |
Solution 4 | Arelav |