'How to make a Swift enum with associated values equatable
I have an enum of associated values which I would like to make equatable for testing purposes, but do not know how this pattern would work with an enum case with more than one argument.
For example, summarised below I know the syntax for making heading equatable. How would this work for options, which contains multiple values of different types?
enum ViewModel {
case heading(String)
case options(id: String, title: String, enabled: Bool)
}
func ==(lhs: ViewModel, rhs: ViewModel) -> Bool {
switch (lhs, rhs) {
case (let .heading(lhsString), let .heading(rhsString)):
return lhsString == rhsString
case options...
default:
return false
}
}
I know Swift 4.1 can synthesize conformance for Equatable for us, but at present I am not able to update to this version.
Solution 1:[1]
SE-0185 Synthesizing Equatable and Hashable conformance has been implemented in Swift 4.1, so that it suffices do declare conformance to the protocol (if all members are Equatable
):
enum ViewModel: Equatable {
case heading(String)
case options(id: String, title: String, enabled: Bool)
}
For earlier Swift versions, a convenient way is to use that tuples can be compared with ==
.
You many also want to enclose the compatibility code in a Swift version check, so that the automatic synthesis is used once the project is updated to Swift 4.1:
enum ViewModel: Equatable {
case heading(String)
case options(id: String, title: String, enabled: Bool)
#if swift(>=4.1)
#else
static func ==(lhs: ViewModel, rhs: ViewModel) -> Bool {
switch (lhs, rhs) {
case (let .heading(lhsString), let .heading(rhsString)):
return lhsString == rhsString
case (let .options(lhsId, lhsTitle, lhsEnabled), let .options(rhsId, rhsTitle, rhsEnabled)):
return (lhsId, lhsTitle, lhsEnabled) == (rhsId, rhsTitle, rhsEnabled)
default:
return false
}
}
#endif
}
Solution 2:[2]
You can add something like below, check this link for more information. Return statement for options depend on your needs.
#if swift(>=4.1)
#else
func ==(lhs: ViewModel, rhs: ViewModel) -> Bool {
switch (lhs, rhs) {
case (let .heading(lhsString), let .heading(rhsString)):
return lhsString == rhsString
case (let .options(id1, title1, enabled1),let .options(id2, title2, enabled2)):
return id1 == id2 && title1 == title2 && enabled1 == enabled2
default:
return false
}
}
#endif
Solution 3:[3]
Elegant way to work with associated value ( even if the enum is indirect):
first you need to have the value
property:
indirect enum MyEnum {
var value: String? {
return String(describing: self).components(separatedBy: "(").first
}
case greeting(text: String)
case goodbye(bool: Bool)
case hey
case none
}
print(MyEnum.greeting(text: "Howdy").value)
// prints : greeting
now you can use the value
to implement Equatable
like this:
indirect enum MyEnum: Equatable {
static func == (lhs: MyEnum, rhs: MyEnum) -> Bool {
lhs.value == rhs.value
}
var value: String? {
return String(describing: self).components(separatedBy: "(").first
}
case greeting(text: String)
case goodbye(bool: Bool)
case hey
case none
}
Solution 4:[4]
Maybe not relevant for the OP but this might help others:
Remember that if you only want to compare an enum value against a fixed value, you can simply use pattern matching:
if case let ViewModel.heading(title) = enumValueToCompare {
// Do something with title
}
If you care about the associated value, you can add some conditions on it:
if case let ViewModel.heading(title) = enumValueToCompare, title == "SomeTitle" {
// Do something with title
}
Sources
This article follows the attribution requirements of Stack Overflow and is licensed under CC BY-SA 3.0.
Source: Stack Overflow
Solution | Source |
---|---|
Solution 1 | |
Solution 2 | |
Solution 3 | |
Solution 4 | Coconuts |