'Why doesn't GraphQL accept this scalar argument type, instead complaining "argument type must be Input Type but got: undefined"?
I have
export const getPicture = {
type: GraphPicture,
args: {
type: new GraphQLNonNull(GraphQLInt)
},
resolve(_, args) {
return Picture.findByPrimary(args.id);
}
};
export const getPictureList = {
type: new GraphQLList(GraphPicture),
resolve(_, __, session) {
return Picture.findAll({where: {owner: session.userId}});
}
};
and
const query = new GraphQLObjectType({
name: 'Queries',
fields: () => {
return {
getPictureList: getPictureList,
getPicture: getPicture
}
}
});
const schema = new GraphQLSchema({
query: query,
mutation: mutation
});
Which throws:
Error: Queries.getPicture(type:) argument type must be Input Type but got: undefined.
getPictureList works fine; getPicture fails with a scalar argument type of GraphQLInt or GraphQLNonNull(GraphQLInt). I have tried making getPicture a GraphQLLIst, but it didn't help. I have tried making the argument type an Input Type, but it didn't help.
Why is the code generating the error, and how can it be fixed?
The stack trace is:
Error: Queries.getPicture(type:) argument type must be Input Type but got: undefined.
at invariant (/home/jrootham/dev/trytheseon/node_modules/graphql/jsutils/invariant.js:19:11)
at /home/jrootham/dev/trytheseon/node_modules/graphql/type/definition.js:307:33
at Array.map (native)
at /home/jrootham/dev/trytheseon/node_modules/graphql/type/definition.js:304:52
at Array.forEach (native)
at defineFieldMap (/home/jrootham/dev/trytheseon/node_modules/graphql/type/definition.js:293:14)
at GraphQLObjectType.getFields (/home/jrootham/dev/trytheseon/node_modules/graphql/type/definition.js:250:46)
at /home/jrootham/dev/trytheseon/node_modules/graphql/type/schema.js:224:27
at typeMapReducer (/home/jrootham/dev/trytheseon/node_modules/graphql/type/schema.js:236:7)
at Array.reduce (native)
at new GraphQLSchema (/home/jrootham/dev/trytheseon/node_modules/graphql/type/schema.js:104:34)
at Object. (/home/jrootham/dev/trytheseon/server/graphQL.js:45:16)
at Module._compile (module.js:399:26)
at normalLoader (/usr/lib/node_modules/babel/node_modules/babel-core/lib/babel/api/register/node.js:160:5)
at Object.require.extensions.(anonymous function) [as .js] (/usr/lib/node_modules/babel/node_modules/babel-core/lib/babel/api/register/node.js:173:7)
at Module.load (module.js:345:32)
at Function.Module._load (module.js:302:12)
at Module.require (module.js:355:17)
at require (internal/module.js:13:17)
at Object. (/home/jrootham/dev/trytheseon/devServer.js:14:44)
at Module._compile (module.js:399:26)
at normalLoader (/usr/lib/node_modules/babel/node_modules/babel-core/lib/babel/api/register/node.js:160:5)
Solution 1:[1]
The problem isn't the return type of the query but the type you have specified to your args.
export const getPicture = {
type: GraphPicture,
args: {
type: new GraphQLNonNull(GraphQLInt)
},
resolve(_, args) {
return Picture.findByPrimary(args.id);
}
};
Assuming you meant to have an argument named "type" it should be:
export const getPicture = {
type: GraphPicture,
args: {
type: {
type: new GraphQLNonNull(GraphQLInt)
}
},
resolve(_, args) {
return Picture.findByPrimary(args.id);
}
};
here is an example from the graphql-js repo:
hero: {
type: characterInterface,
args: {
episode: {
description: 'If omitted, returns the hero of the whole saga. If ' +
'provided, returns the hero of that particular episode.',
type: episodeEnum
}
},
resolve: (root, { episode }) => getHero(episode),
},
See the full schema from the graphql-js repo here: https://github.com/graphql/graphql-js/blob/master/src/tests/starWarsSchema.js
Solution 2:[2]
Just for reference, I got here searching the same error just not with undefined, but with my own Product type:
... argument * must be Input Type but got Product
Turned out that in GraphQL what you pass to a Mutation should be either scalar type (String, Integer, ...) or user defined input type, not type type.
http://graphql.org/graphql-js/mutations-and-input-types/
input ProductInput {
id: ID
name: String
}
I was trying to pass in my Product type:
type Product {
id: ID
name: String
}
This feels a bit redundant, but guess, I'll be glad for having it separated later.
Sources
This article follows the attribution requirements of Stack Overflow and is licensed under CC BY-SA 3.0.
Source: Stack Overflow
| Solution | Source |
|---|---|
| Solution 1 | j0k |
| Solution 2 | kub1x |
