'How can I conform a Swift actor to a protocol while preserving isolation?

Let's say we have the following goals:

  1. We want to use actors.
  2. We want to use dependency injection and resolve actors through DI.
  3. We want to hide our actors behind protocols so we can vary the implementation.
  4. We want to preserve actor isolation, otherwise there's no point in using actors.

So the specific question is: How can we conform a Swift actor to a protocol while preserving isolation?

protocol Zippity {
  func foo()
}

actor Zappity: Zippity {
  func foo() {} // Doesn't compile
}

I can make it compile with …

actor Zappity: Zippity {
  nonisolated func foo() {}
}

… but that seems to defeat the purpose. I also tried declaring the interface method async but that also didn't compile.

I can think of several reasonable workarounds, including composition, nonisolated async methods that call isolated methods, etc. but wanted to see if there's something I'm missing.



Solution 1:[1]

OK, I've discovered the answer, and it's pretty straightforward:

protocol Zippity: Actor {
  func foo()
}

actor Zappity: Zippity {
  func foo() // This is a properly isolated method
}

It seems that declaring conformity to the Actor protocol enables the compiler magic.

Sources

This article follows the attribution requirements of Stack Overflow and is licensed under CC BY-SA 3.0.

Source: Stack Overflow

Solution Source
Solution 1 Gregory Higley