'Two foreign keys reference one table - ON UPDATE SET NULL doesn't work
I've got two foreign keys in a table. Let's assume that table is called News
and has foreign keys updatedById
and createdById
, both of which point to userId
in table Users
.
Now I want to set to NULL
foreign keys when user is deleted, but when I try to set ON DELETE SET NULL
in that relationships I get:
Introducing FOREIGN KEY constraint 'FK_News_Users' on table 'News' may cause cycles or multiple cascade paths. Specify ON DELETE NO ACTION or ON UPDATE NO ACTION, or modify other FOREIGN KEY constraints.
I don't understand why both foreign keys can't set to null?
Solution 1:[1]
The series of cascading referential actions triggered by a single DELETE or UPDATE must form a tree that contains no circular references. No table can appear more than one time in the list of all cascading referential actions that result from the DELETE or UPDATE. Also, the tree of cascading referential actions must not have more than one path to any specified table. Any branch of the tree is ended when it encounters a table for which NO ACTION has been specified or is the default.
Possibly in situations like this you might want to consider to implement functionality to delete user logically rather then physically (e.g. by introducing a flag field Active or Deleted in Users
table). That way all relationships stay intact and can be analyzed retrospectively.
But if you still need to implement ON DELETE SET NULL
for both FK's you can use a FOR DELETE
trigger on User
table like this:
CREATE TRIGGER Users_News_Delete_Trigger
ON Users FOR DELETE
AS BEGIN
UPDATE News SET createdById = NULL
WHERE createdById = DELETED.id;
UPDATE News SET updatedById = NULL
WHERE updatedById = DELETED.id;
END
Solution 2:[2]
One alternative is to create a cross reference table between table A and table B where each entry is A.ID and B.ID and B.ID has a foreign key to B. Then you can simply CASCADE deletes to the cross reference. You will need to put a third field in your cross reference to state the unique purpose of reference such as
[NewsID] INT NOT NULL DEFAULT 0,
[UsersID] INT NOT NULL DEFAULT 0,
[IsCreatedBy] bit NOT NULL DEFAULT 0
Naturally, you would then take those fields out of table A. The left join will then give you null for those fields if they are missing.
Solution 3:[3]
I don't think it's possible (in SQL Server) to do it on 2 or more FK constraints on the same table, pointing to the same FK.
Normally in situations like this you'd rather delete user logically then physically by introducing a flag field (e.g. Active or Deleted). That way all relationships stay intact and can be analyzed retrospectively. --- peterm
If you want to stick with the original idea of setting NULL, a way around the problem would be to handle your deletion of users in a stored procedure and have it perform the updates immediately afterwards.
CREATE PROCEDURE sp_DeleteUser
@UserId INT
AS
BEGIN
SET NOCOUNT ON;
DELETE FROM Users WHERE Id = @UserId;
UPDATE News SET created_byId = NULL WHERE created_byId = @UserId;
UPDATE News SET updated_byId = NULL WHERE created_byId = @UserId;
END
GO
Solution 4:[4]
Multiple Delete/Update Rules when multiple foreign keys reference one table:
Years after you asked this question, I had the same problem.
I have Currencies
and Products
tables (i simplified for sharing) in my database as in the diagram:
I needed to SET NULL
both columns BuyingCurrencyId
and SellingCurrencyId
when I delete a record from table Currencies
. SQL Server does not support multiple INSERT And UPDATE Specification
in a structure like this.
In this case, a temporary solution can be produced by adding a boolean IsDeleted
column to table Currencies
. But in a large database, even if the DeleteRule || UpdateRule
specifications is passed around with such a tricky solution in a table, it will definitely be necessary somewhere in the database.
I got the following conflict occurred in database error in all of the triggers I created before:
And finally I was able to solve the problem by creating the following trigger:
USE [FooBarDatabase]
GO
--DROP TRIGGER accounting.Currency_Delete_Trigger
--GO
CREATE TRIGGER accounting.Currency_Delete_Trigger
ON accounting.Currencies INSTEAD OF DELETE
AS BEGIN
UPDATE stock.Products
SET BuyingCurrencyId = NULL,
SellingCurrencyId = NULL
WHERE BuyingCurrencyId in (SELECT Id FROM deleted)
AND SellingCurrencyId in (SELECT Id FROM deleted);
DELETE accounting.Currencies
WHERE Id in (SELECT Id FROM deleted);
END
GO
ALTER TABLE [accounting].[Currencies]
ENABLE TRIGGER [Currency_Delete_Trigger]
GO
Sources
This article follows the attribution requirements of Stack Overflow and is licensed under CC BY-SA 3.0.
Source: Stack Overflow
Solution | Source |
---|---|
Solution 1 | |
Solution 2 | |
Solution 3 | |
Solution 4 |